Feed aggregator

Une vidéo très virale prétend montrer des militants propalestiniens menaçant de transformer la France en Etat islamique. Mais c'est un faux document, relayé par des comptes automatisés. Il s’agit d’une campagne de désinformation pro-russe visant à discréditer la France.

Urlaub im Villaggio Europa verspricht pure Entspannung und vielfältige Aktivitäten für die ganze Familie. Die Anlage besticht durch eine familiäre Atmosphäre und Ihre umfassenden Angebote, die keinen Wunsch offenlassen.

Die Unterkünfte sind sauber und gut gepflegt, was den Aufenthalt besonders angenehm gestaltet. Dazu trägt auch das freundliche und hilfsbereite Personal bei, das stets bemüht ist, Ihren Urlaub so schön wie möglich zu machen.

Das gastronomische Angebot vor Ort lässt keine Wünsche offen: Von lokalen Spezialitäten bis hin zu internationalen Gerichten wird hier jeder Geschmack getroffen. Auch für reichlich Abenteuer ist gesorgt, denn das breite Freizeitangebot des Villaggio Europa bietet etwas für Kinder und Erwachsene gleichermaßen.

Das Wichtigste in Kürze

• Familiäre Atmosphäre mit freundlichem und hilfsbereitem Personal.
• Saubere und gut gepflegte Unterkünfte mit moderner Ausstattung.
• Vielfältiges Freizeitangebot für Kinder und Erwachsene.
• Reichhaltiges gastronomisches Angebot mit lokalen und internationalen Gerichten.
• Wunderschöne Strände und tolle Ausflugsmöglichkeiten in der Umgebung.

Familiäre Atmosphäre und umfassende Aktivitäten

Villaggio Europa bietet eine familiäre Atmosphäre, die sofort spürbar ist, sobald Sie das Gelände betreten. Die Mitarbeiter sind stets bemüht, dass sich jeder Gast wie zu Hause fühlt und stehen Ihnen für Fragen oder Anliegen jederzeit zur Verfügung. Dank der vielfältigen umfassenden Aktivitäten kommt bei Groß und Klein garantiert keine Langeweile auf.

Weiterführende Informationen: Deka Unternehmerstrategie Europa CF: Erfolgsplan

Saubere und gut gepflegte Unterkünfte

Villaggio Europa Rezensionen: Urlaub pur

Die Unterkünfte im Villaggio Europa lassen keine Wünsche offen. Sauberkeit und gute Pflege stehen hier an erster Stelle. Die Zimmer werden regelmäßig gereinigt und jedes Detail wird sorgfältig überprüft, damit Ihr Aufenthalt so angenehm wie möglich ist. Die Ausstattung ist modern und funktional, sodass Sie sich sofort wohlfühlen können.

Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on Earth. – Muhammad Ali

Freundliches und hilfsbereites Personal

Die Gastfreundlichkeit im Villaggio Europa ist außergewöhnlich. Das Personal wird oft als überaus freundlich und hilfsbereit beschrieben. Sie bemühen sich stets, Ihren Aufenthalt so angenehm wie möglich zu gestalten.

Reichhaltiges gastronomisches Angebot vor Ort

Das reichhaltige gastronomische Angebot vor Ort lässt keine Wünsche offen. Von traditioneller italienischer Küche bis hin zu internationalen Speisen gibt es hier alles, was das Herz begehrt. Die hochwertigen Menüs der verschiedenen Restaurants sind nicht nur geschmacklich herausragend, sondern auch hervorragend präsentiert.

Vertiefende Einblicke: Zypern Karte Europa: Inselparadies

.table-responsiv {width: 100%;padding: 0px;margin-bottom: 0px;overflow-y: hidden;border: 1px solid #DDD;overflow-x: auto;min-height: 0.01%;} Merkmal Beschreibung Besonderheiten Familiäre Atmosphäre Die freundlichen Mitarbeiter sorgen dafür, dass sich jeder Gast wie zu Hause fühlt. Persönlicher Service und Herzlichkeit Saubere und gepflegte Unterkünfte Regelmäßige Reinigung und moderne Ausstattung der Zimmer. Hoher Hygienestandard Vielfältiges Freizeitangebot Aktivitäten für Kinder und Erwachsene, von Sport bis Wellness. Abwechslungsreiche Programme Breites Freizeitangebot für Kinder und Erwachsene

Breites Freizeitangebot für Kinder und Erwachsene – Villaggio Europa Rezensionen: Urlaub pur

Das breite Freizeitangebot im Villaggio Europa hält für Kinder und Erwachsene gleichermaßen spannende Aktivitäten bereit. Sie können an verschiedenen Sport- und Abenteuerspielen teilnehmen oder kreative Workshops besuchen, die von erfahrenen Animateuren geleitet werden. Die Anlage bietet zudem spezielle Bereiche wie einen Kinderclub, in dem die Jüngsten unter Aufsicht spielen und lernen können, sowie zahlreiche Unterhaltungsprogramme am Abend.

Empfehlung: Sehenswürdigkeiten in Europa: Die Top-Highlights

Gut ausgestattete Sport- und Wellness-Einrichtungen

Die Sport- und Wellness-Einrichtungen im Villaggio Europa sind durchdacht konzipiert und bieten eine Vielfalt an Möglichkeiten für die Gäste. Die Anlagen sind moderne und gut gepflegte Einrichtungen, die den Gästen ein hervorragendes Sporterlebnis ermöglichen. Von Tennisplätzen über Schwimmbäder bis hin zu einem voll ausgestatteten Fitnessstudio gibt es für jeden Geschmack etwas Passendes. Darüber hinaus sorgen wohltuende Wellness-Angebote wie Sauna und Massagen für völlige Entspannung während Ihres Aufenthalts.

Wunderschöne Strände und klares Wasser

Die wunderschönen Strände des Villaggio Europa sind ein wahres Highlight. Das kristallklare Wasser lädt zum Schwimmen und Entspannen ein. Familien können hier unvergessliche Momente genießen, während Sonnenanbeter die warmen Strahlen an den gut gepflegten Sandstränden in vollen Zügen auskosten.

Tolle Ausflugsmöglichkeiten in der Umgebung

Das Villaggio Europa punktet nicht nur durch seine erstklassigen Einrichtungen und freundlichen Service, sondern auch durch die Vielzahl an spannenden Ausflugsmöglichkeiten. Die Region bietet zahlreiche Sehenswürdigkeiten, darunter historische Stätten, malerische Dörfer und wunderschöne Landschaften. Egal ob Sie Entspannung oder Abenteuer suchen, rund um das Villaggio Europa gibt es für jeden Geschmack etwas zu entdecken.

FAQ: Antworten auf häufig gestellte Fragen Gibt es spezielle Angebote für Haustiere? Ja, im Villaggio Europa sind Haustiere willkommen. Es gibt sogar spezielle Bereiche und Dienstleistungen, die auf die Bedürfnisse Ihrer vierbeinigen Freunde zugeschnitten sind. Bitte informieren Sie die Rezeption im Voraus über Ihre Ankunft mit Haustieren, um sicherzustellen, dass alle notwendigen Vorkehrungen getroffen werden können. Wie sieht es mit der Anreise aus? Gibt es Transferservices? Das Villaggio Europa bietet Transferservices vom nächstgelegenen Flughafen oder Bahnhof an. Es ist empfehlenswert, diesen Service bei der Buchung anzufragen, um einen reibungslosen Transfer zu gewährleisten. Gibt es WLAN in der Anlage? Ja, im Villaggio Europa gibt es kostenloses WLAN in den öffentlichen Bereichen und in den Unterkünften. Sollten Sie technische Probleme haben, steht Ihnen das Personal jederzeit zur Verfügung. Welche Zahlungsmethoden werden akzeptiert? Im Villaggio Europa werden verschiedene Zahlungsmethoden akzeptiert, darunter Kreditkarten (Visa, MasterCard), EC-Karten und Barzahlungen. Für zusätzliche Dienstleistungen oder Ausflüge können die Zahlungsmodalitäten variieren. Gibt es medizinische Versorgung vor Ort? Ja, das Villaggio Europa verfügt über eine medizinische Notfallstation sowie Zugang zu lokalen Ärzten und Apotheken. Bei Bedarf kann das Personal medizinische Unterstützung und Beratung anbieten. Werden Fahrräder oder andere Fortbewegungsmittel zum Ausleihen angeboten? Ja, im Villaggio Europa gibt es einen Fahrradverleih sowie andere Fortbewegungsmittel wie Elektroroller, die an der Rezeption gemietet werden können. Diese Dienste ermöglichen es Ihnen, die Umgebung in Ihrem eigenen Tempo zu erkunden.

Der Beitrag Villaggio Europa Rezensionen: Urlaub pur erschien zuerst auf Neurope.eu - News aus Europa.

Charlie Weimers with EU flag and the Sweden Democrat’s party symbol, a bluebell.

By Jan Lundius
STOCKHOLM, Sweden, Sep 19 2025 (IPS)

On September 11, Charlie Weimers, a Swedish Member of the European Parliament and active within the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, rose up during a Parliamentary session and asked for a minute of silence to honour the memory of Charlie Kirk, who the day before had been shot and killed during a political meeting at the Utah Valley University in the U.S.

“Madam President, dear colleagues, the murder of political activist Charlie Kirk, a husband, loving father and patriot has shocked the world. We must strongly condemn political violence and rhetoric that incites violence. Will you stand with me in reflection and prayer in his honour, and I yield the rest of my time for a moment of silence.”

Charlie Weimers began his political career as a member of the Swedish Chrisitan Democrat Party, but later switched to the Sweden Democrats, a nationalist, right-wing populist party, which in spite of efforts to tune it down finds its roots in Neo-Nazi fringe organizations. It is now Sweden’s second largest political party with more than 20 percent of the electorate behind it.

There is nothing wrong in condemning murder political violence and defend freedom of speech, but this cannot hinder us from scrutinizing who is canonized as a victim of radical aggression. Charlie Kirk was 33 years old when he was murdered, leaving a wife and two small children behind. He had admitted that when he in 2012 started Turning Point USA, which eventually would become a rich and powerful organization, he had “no money, no connections and no idea of what I was doing.” At that time, Kirk had dropped out of college and been rejected by The U.S. West Point Military Academy. Nevertheless, he had rhetorical gifts for countering progressive ideas, being sensitive about cultural tensions, and endowed with an aptitude for making provocative declarations that resonated with frustrated college audiences, who followed and agreed with his web postings. Kirk’s frequent college rallies eventually attracted tens of thousands of young voters, as well as the attention and financial support of conservative leaders. President Trump was not wrong when he declared that:

The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead. No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie.

After his death Kirk has been praised for showing up at campuses where he talked with anyone who would approach him. Conservative journalists have declared him to be one of the era’s most effective practitioners of persuasion. Kirk’s message was readily embraced by youngsters who accepted his view that Democrats had spent hundreds of billions of dollars on illegal immigrants and foreign nations, while the young “lost generation” of the U.S. had to pinch their pennies, but would not be able to own a home, never marry, and even be forced to work until they died, abused and childless. However, he also gave them hope, telling these unfortunate youngsters that they did not have to stay poor and accept being worse off than their parents. They just had to avoid supporting corrupt political leaders, who were lying to them only to take advantage of their votes. Kirk assured his young audience that it is an undeniable fact that cultural identity is disappearing, while sexual anarchy, crime and decadence reign unabated, private property is a thing of the past, and a ruling “liberal” class controls everything. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, was probably right when she said that Kirk had inspired millions of young people “to get involved in politics and fight for our nation’s conservative values.”

Kirk allied his Turning Point USA not to any poor radical fringe groups, but to conservative, wealthy donors and influencers. He preached a “Christian Message” well adapted to several members of such groups, declaring that Turning Point USA was dedicated to “recruiting pastors and other church leaders to be active in local and national political issues.”

Kirk fervently defended the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, i.e. “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed “, declaring that it was worth “a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can keep a Second Amendment which protect our other God-given rights”.

However, Kirk was not happy about the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed “discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex, or national origin in employment, education, and public accommodations.” He stated that the Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake” and declared that if the majority of Americans were asked if they respected the Civil Rights Act the answer would have been a “no”. Adding the caveat that “I could be wrong, but I think I’m right.”

Undoubtedly, there was a racist ingredient in Kirk’s ideology. He did for example state that the concept of white privilege was a myth and a “racist lie”. In October 2021, he launched an Exposing Critical Racism Tour to numerous campuses and other institutions, to “combat racist theories”, by which he meant the propagation of an understanding of the relationships between social conceptions of race and ethnicity, social and political laws and mass media, all of which Kirk considered to be propaganda and an unfounded brainchild of liberal Democrats. He blamed the DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programmes for threatening U.S. competitiveness and security, even claiming that upon sitting in a plane and realising that the pilot was “Black”, he could not help thinking “’Hey, I hope he’s qualified”.

Like most populist, “patriotic”, European right-wing political parties, not the least the Sweden Democrats, though they nowadays try to hide it more carefully than before, Kirk endorsed the so-called “great replacement theory”. This way of thinking assumes that powerful, nefarious actors, for some obscure reason, are trying to replace an upright indigenous, generally white-skinned population with immigrants of “doubtful” origin. Kirk did not even hesitate to state that Democrats supposedly wanted to make the U.S. “less white”.

Kirk also argued that humans have no significant effect on global climate change and joined antivax activists by, among other statements, calling the mandatory requirements for students to get the COVID-19 vaccine “medical apartheid”. Kirk was outspoken when it came to claim that Trump’s loss in the president elections of 2022 was due to fraud, supported the “stop the steal” movement and denied that the violent attacks on the Capitol were an insurrection.

Opposing political violence and supporting free speech does not mean that you have to sanctify a victim like Charlie Kirik, who after all was a racist and an incendiary agitator against underprivileged groups, as well as he degraded scientists who warned against climate change and vaccine denial. It is not defensible that such a voice, no matter how despicable it might be, is silenced by violence and murder. However, we cannot refrain from pointing out the great harm the kind of agitation Kirk devoted himself to can cause. As an educator, I have often been forced to experience how children suffer from racism and bigotry preached and condoned by influencers like Charlie Kirk. Accordingly, to sanctify such persons and tolerate their prejudiced ideology is hurtful and dangerous.

Furthermore, let us not be fooled by deceitful propaganda trying to convince us that Charlie Kirk’s so called “debates” were neither aggressive, nor mendacious. They were brutally provocative; opponents were shouted down, or belittled. The rhetoric was hateful, contempt was poured out over women, Black people, immigrants and Muslims, queer and trans people. Liberals were branded as enemies, science demeaned. And, yes – Charlie Kirk turned to young people, who felt frustrated, marginalized and despised, telling them that he wanted to give them hope and a will to fight injustice. But at what price? Based on what truth? Incitement to violence and contempt for humanity might be safeguarded in the name of free speech, but it should never be accepted and defended. It must be attacked through an unconstrained press based on facts, a well-founded science, and an unfaltering respect for human rights.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Le nombre de centenaires japonais a atteint 99 763 en septembre, les femmes représentant 88 % du total. Pourquoi en est-il ainsi, et pourquoi certains remettent-ils en question ces chiffres ?

Trump spoke of agreements on visits and TikTok, while China's readout was more circumspect.

Luca Zidane, the son of France's World Cup-winning playmaker Zinedine, switches his international allegiance from France to Algeria.

After the collapse of the USSR, Moldova emerged as a fragile state, burdened by weak institutions and deep socio-economic crises. The 1992 armed conflict in Transnistria further exposed these vulnerabilities. Although the conflict was frozen, for over three decades, it has remained an inseparable part of Moldova’s political landscape.

Moldova today is not merely a small post-Soviet republic. Situated between Romania and Ukraine, it lies at the intersection of EU and Russian spheres of influence. For this reason, every election and political decision attracts serious attention, both regionally and internationally.

European leaders — German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen — broke diplomatic protocol by traveling directly to Chișinău to openly endorse President Maia Sandu’s Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS).

Their message was clear: if Moldova embarks on the path of EU accession, it will enjoy economic growth and even find solutions to the Transnistrian conflict.

Yet this approach has sparked controversy. Opposition figures argue that open support from EU leaders disrupts electoral balance and undermines the legitimacy of the ruling party.

During the Biden administration, Moldova received millions of dollars in U.S. assistance, some of which had originally been earmarked for Ukraine. Former USAID Administrator Samantha Power stated bluntly: “We gave Moldova unprecedented support; we expanded USAID programs significantly.”

But the new administration — represented by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio — has sharply criticized this policy. In their view, if a nation’s democracy depends on foreign money, then it was never strong to begin with.

The United States is now shifting toward a more distant stance, leaving Moldova’s future more in the hands of the European Union. As elections approach, Sandu’s government faces serious accusations:  pressure on opposition figures, closure of independent media outlets, and restrictions on access to polling stations.

Opposition leader Ion Ceban, mayor of Chișinău, stated bluntly: “They are holding the country hostage. They tell us: if you don’t support us, war in Transnistria may flare up again.”

The government denies these charges, insisting all measures comply with Moldovan law. Yet the pre-election climate is far from democratic standards. Former Israeli Communication Minister Ayoob Kara has assessed the Moldovan situation as follows: “Democracy cannot be sustained merely through pressure from Brussels or Washington; it must be strengthened by the free will of Moldova’s citizens. When foreign interventions distort electoral balance, public trust erodes. What we truly need are equal conditions, free media, and every citizen’s ability to express their vote freely.”

His statement underscores three critical points:

1. The risk of foreign intervention — it may undermine democratic legitimacy.
2. The necessity of strong domestic institutions — the only path to long-term stability.
3. Public trust — the true foundation of democracy.

 Kara’s remarks highlight that while international actors shape the playing field, genuine democracy depends on the people themselves. Moldova may be small, but it has become a symbolic battleground in the global struggle for influence.

 For the EU: Moldova is meant to be a success story of European integration. For the U.S, the new administration prefers distance, but for Donald Trump, resolving the Transnistrian issue could represent a major diplomatic achievement — perhaps even strengthening his case for the Nobel Peace Prize.

As Vice President JD Vance put it: “If your democracy can be destroyed by a few hundred thousand dollars in foreign advertising, then it wasn’t very strong to begin with.”

These words echo Kara’s perspective: one from the outside, the other from within the region, but both pointing to the same truth — real democracy can only be built on the will of the people and the strength of domestic institutions.

The Moldovan elections provide three key lessons:

1. For the West: The limits of exporting democracy are becoming clearer.
2. For Moldova: The real issue is preserving internal legitimacy.
3. For the international community: Democracy cannot be imported; it must grow from within.

Moldova’s elections are not just about one small country’s domestic politics — they are also a critical test of whether the West’s model of democracy promotion will succeed or fail.

Les declarations de Sophia Chikirou, qui << ne considere pas que la Chine est une dictature >>, font grincer des dents chez les Insoumis. Mais l'ordre regne.

La mobilisation était massive le 18 septembre dans les outre-mer, lors de la journée de grève et de manifestation coordonnée par l'intersyndicale visant à peser sur les choix budgétaires du nouveau Premier ministre. Les manifestants étaient plus nombreux que le 10 septembre et l'accent était mis sur les problématiques locales dans leurs revendications.

Written by Pieter Baert.

G7 statement

On 28 June 2025, the G7 issued a statement expressing a ‘shared understanding’ that the domestic and foreign profits of US-parented multinational groups would be excluded from the scope of Pillar Two, the OECD-G20 global minimum corporate tax framework. Instead, the G7 signalled readiness to work on a ‘side-by-side’ approach in which the US GILTI regime, its current minimum tax on foreign earnings of US parented groups – would co-exist with Pillar Two. The statement allowed for the withdrawal of proposed US retaliatory measures (‘section 899’) that had been included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).

Reminder: Pillar Two applies a 15 % global minimum effective tax rate using a hierarchical rule order to ensure large multinational enterprises are taxed appropriately in each jurisdiction:

• 1. The Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) – Gives the local jurisdiction first claim to top up low-taxed domestic profits.
• 2. The Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) – The ultimate parent’s jurisdiction imposes a top-up tax on the local parent entity to make up for any remaining low-taxed profits of foreign entities.
• 3. The Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) – If the IIR is not applied by the ultimate parent’s jurisdiction, the UTPR steps in as a backstop, with lower-tier jurisdictions imposing top-up taxes on local entities to make up for any remaining low-taxed profits in the parent jurisdiction or any other third jurisdiction.

Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 introduced Pillar Two’s minimum tax rules in the EU.

Given the broad nature of the G7 statement, which speaks of ‘accepted principles’, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions at this stage. Based on its wording, a side-by-side approach – if endorsed by the OECD Inclusive Framework – could imply that non-US jurisdictions would not apply the UTPR to local entities of US-parented groups in respect of low-taxed profits arising in the US or in another jurisdiction that does not apply the QDMTT or the IIR. However, the statement does not explicitly clarify the specific terms of the exemption. For instance, it does not address how US intermediary parent entities within non-US multinational groups would be treated for minimum tax purposes, the potential creditability of the GILTI tax in relation to a jurisdiction’s QDMTT, or how the side-by-side approach would be defined in legislation.

NCTI and Pillar Two

As Pillar Two and the US’ GILTI (now called ‘NCTI’ under the OBBBA) operate on different principles and design features, it is difficult to assess to what extent the side-by-side approach could raise concerns about a level playing field or lead to base erosion and profit shifting among the multinational companies subject to each regime. Potential competitive disadvantages arise not only from differences in direct tax liabilities but also from the variations in the administrative and legal complexity of the respective regimes.

The OBBBA, signed into law in July 2025, introduced several adjustments allowing NCTI to more accurately reflect the real outcomes of Pillar Two. It increased the effective tax rate to 14 % (up from 13.125 %) and removed the carve-out for the Qualified Business Asset Investment (QBAI), thereby broadening the taxable base.

However, a key difference between the two systems remains: the ‘blending’ of income. Pillar Two requires corporate groups to meet a minimum level of tax in each jurisdiction where they operate (‘jurisdictional blending’), while the US’ NCTI allows income and foreign taxes to be blended across all foreign countries (‘global blending’). This way, low-taxed income can be offset with high-taxed income elsewhere and profits in some jurisdictions can be reduced by losses in others.

Table 1 – Key comparisons between OECD G20 Pillar Two and US NCTI

 OECD-G20 – Pillar TwoUS – NCTITax rate15 %14 %Tax baseBased on accounting incomeBased on US taxable incomeBlendingJurisdictional blendingGlobal blendingCarve-outsBased on payroll and tangible assets (SBIE)Payroll or tangible assets do not qualify for a carve-out

Note: The effective 14 % floor of NCTI results from the interaction of the 21 % US statutory corporate tax rate, the 60% inclusion of NCTI taxable income and the 90 % foreign tax credit limitation ((21 % * 60 %)/90 % = 14 %).

Additionally, the OBBA introduced broader corporate tax changes, such as permanent expensing for domestic R&D investments and a higher interest deductibility cap, to enhance US competitiveness.

Pillar One

The G7’s statement noted that the delivery of the side-by-side system ‘will facilitate further progress to stabilize the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy’, referencing the negotiations on Pillar One. During the September 2025 plenary session, in response to questions from Members of the European Parliament on Pillar One and the prospects for a European digital services tax (DST), the European Commission acknowledged that Pillar One discussions were ‘on hold’ but could resume once a Pillar Two solution is reached. To give the OECD-led process space and time to deliver, the Commission stated that it does not intend to table a new proposal for a DST at this stage.

Several countries have already implemented or announced digital services taxes (DSTs), with revenues steadily increasing over time, showcasing the continuous growth of the digital economy. In 2023, Spain, Italy and France collectively generated €1.4 billion from their DSTs. However, estimating the revenue potential of an EU-wide DST would heavily depend on key design parameters, such as the definition of in-scope activities (the types of digital services or business activities that would fall under the tax), the applicable tax rate, and the revenue thresholds.

Table 2 – Revenue of DSTs, € million, 2019-2023

Revenue (€ million)20192020202120222023Spain  €166€295€323France€277€375€474€621€668Italy €233€303€394€434

Data source: Data on Taxation Trends – European Commission. All three countries apply a 3 % DST on turnover from online advertising, user data sales and digital platforms, with a €750 million global revenue threshold and varying domestic thresholds: €3 million (Spain), €25 million (France), and €5.5 million (Italy; lowered to €0 in 2025).

Read this ‘at a glance’ note on ‘Side by side? The future of Pillar Two minimum corporate tax rules‘ in the Think Tank pages of the European Parliament.

Entre le roi de l'empire du Mali Bakari II et Christophe Colomb, qui était le premier à découvrir l'Amérique ? Des historiens, archéologues et ethnologues se sont mis sur la piste de cette recherche. Voici leur réponse.

It is no secret that CPEC has failed to achieve its set goals on time. But is China to blame – or Pakistan itself?

La Commission européenne peine à apaiser les craintes suscitées par son projet d’utiliser des centaines de milliards d’euros liés aux avoirs de la Banque centrale de Russie gelés dans l’UE pour financer un « prêt de réparation » pour l’Ukraine.

The post La Belgique « sceptique » quant à l’utilisation des avoirs russes gelés pour financer un « prêt de réparation » à l’Ukraine appeared first on Euractiv FR.

In his annual State of the Nation speech, Tokayev gave new insights into how he envisions the development of Kazakhstan as a digital state.

Kazakhstan should be, and has been, commended for strengthening legal protections for women and holding perpetrators accountable, but more must be done.

Marine One a été dérouté alors qu'il transportait Donald Trump de Chequers à l'aéroport de Stansted.

Héritées des indépendances, les frontières latino-américaines sont bien loin d'être intangibles. De nombreux différends opposent des pays à leurs voisins ou à une puissance européenne. Les récits nationaux, souvent renforcés par les programmes scolaires, entretiennent la sacralisation des territoires. Et (...) / Amérique latine, Colonialisme, Conflit, Droit international, Géopolitique, Histoire, Impérialisme, Relations Nord-Sud, Relations internationales, Géographie, Matières premières, Amérique du Sud, Colonisation, Frontières, Relations bilatérales, Décolonisation, Accord international - 2022/11

Bruxelles ne respectera pas la date limite fixée à fin septembre pour présenter aux Nations unies sa contribution à l’action climatique mondiale jusqu’en 2035, en raison de profondes divisions entre les ministres sur le niveau d’ambition que l’UE devrait afficher.

The post Climat : think tanks et ONG dénoncent les engagements flous du Conseil de l’UE appeared first on Euractiv FR.

Die Maßnahmen sehen unter anderem ein Importverbot für russisches Flüssigerdgas (LNG) ab Januar 2027 vor sowie ein umfassendes Transaktionsverbot für die Ölkonzerne Rosneft und Gazprom Neft.

Le Premier ministre espagnol Pedro Sánchez a déclaré que l’accord initial de répartition des tâches entre l’Espagne, l’Allemagne et la France devait être respecté dans le cadre du projet européen d’avion de combat du futur (SCAF), soutenant ainsi Berlin dans son différend à ce sujet avec Paris.

The post L’Espagne se range du côté de Berlin dans le bras de fer avec Paris sur le projet d’avion de combat du futur appeared first on Euractiv FR.