“The future belongs to those who wake up early,” say the French. The discussion during our roundtable on the Circular Economy Action Plan, which was unveiled last December, proves exactly that.
On 27 April, we had the pleasure to host Mrs. Pietikäinen, the European Parliament’s rapporteur on the 2015 Circular Economy own-initiative report, Mr. Radziejewski from European Commission Vice-President Katainen’s cabinet, as well as industry and NGO representatives for a roundtable discussion on the practical implementation of the Action Plan.
The roundtable clearly showed that no action will move forward without input from civil society and industry. Institutions – including the Council whose role was emphasised – will be looking at concrete case studies as well as proposals, in order to ensure that “Europe closes the loop”. Policy makers underlined they need to know how policy and regulation can support competitive and resource efficient business models.
Speakers and all participants who expressed their views showed genuine commitment to the Circular Economy agenda. Some of them however insisted on the extraordinary challenges that such transition present for both industry and society. These challenges will need to be addressed in the coming months.
“The future will be for those who get it & want to act” will be the institutions’ motto in the coming months, as they consult and work on turning the Action Plan into reality. The roundtable demonstrated a clear interest and commitment to enhance dialogue between stakeholders. At FleishmanHillard we are therefore planning further roundtables, focusing on specific actions, issues and sectors in order to mirror the institutional agendas.
Should you want to engage on this dossier or have a recommendation as far as next roundtables are concerned, don’t hesitate to get in touch with us – with Robert Anger to be precise at Robert.anger@fleishmaneurope.com.
The FleishmanHillard Circular Economy team
On 28 April 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) agreed, on behalf of the Council, its negotiating stance on a proposed regulation establishing a structural reform programme to help member states implement reforms.
The programme would be established for the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020, with a financial envelope of €142.8 million.
Coreper asked the Netherlands presidency to start negotiations with the European Parliament.
ObjectivesThe aim of the programme is to contribute to institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the member states with a view to enhancing competitiveness, productivity, growth, jobs, cohesion, and investment, in particular in the context of economic governance processes, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of EU funds. The programme would finance actions and activities of European added value.
FinancingMember states would have to submit a request for financial support by 31 October of each calendar year. The financial resources available under the programme would be redirected from other technical assistance programmes under the common provision regulation for structural funds and the Rural Development Fund.
Monitoring and implementationThe Commission would carry out the programme, which would build on best practices with technical assistance to Cyprus and Greece. The Commission would also monitor the implementation of actions financed by the programme.
On 28 April 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) agreed, on behalf of the Council, its negotiating stance aimed at extending by one year the dates of transposition and application of new securities market rules.
The one-year extension will affect the provision of services for investments in financial instruments and on the operation of regulated financial markets. Coreper asked the Netherlands presidency to start negotiations with the European Parliament as soon as possible, so as to enable adoption at first reading of a regulation enacting the extension.
"MIFID" and "MIFIR"A recent revision of rules on financial instruments set out to promote the integration, competitiveness, and efficiency of EU financial markets. The Council adopted these in May 2014, amending and replacing an existing "MIFID" text that regulates markets in financial instruments.
The rules consist of two legislative instruments:
Under the Council's approach:
Additionally, the Council included amendments to the Commission's proposal in its negotiating mandate. These concern trading on own accounts, package transactions, alignment with the EU directive on securities financing transactions and the date of application of certain provisions of a regulation on market abuse.
Implementation challengesBoth the directive and the regulation were to become applicable 30 months after entry into force, i.e. as of 3 January 2017, with member states having to transpose the new directive by 3 July 2016. However, due to technical implementing challenges faced by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and by national competent authorities, essential data infrastructures will not be in place by 3 January 2017.
The new framework requires trading venues and systematic internalisers to provide competent authorities with financial instrument reference data that describes in a uniform manner the characteristics of every financial instrument subject to the scope of MiFID II. In order to collect data in an efficient and harmonised manner, a new data collection infrastructure must be developed. This obliges ESMA, in conjunction with competent national authorities, to establish a data system covering a wider range of financial instruments, given the extended scope of MiFID II.
On 2 October 2015, ESMA informed the Commission that a delay in the technical implementation of MiFID II was unavoidable. Neither competent authorities nor market participants will be in a position to apply the new rules on 3 January 2017. This would lead to legal uncertainty and potential market disruption.
[1] By setting an overall EU cap and a cap per trading venue for the so-called reference price waiver and negotiated transaction waiver.